![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:10 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Maybe someone can tell me for sure.
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
I still really want it. And it's within my price range......
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:27 |
|
3.0 engine is a dead giveaway that it's falsely badged as an M5.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:30 |
|
That was my thought too, but a V8 and that look still makes it appealing. No mileage listed though...l
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:32 |
|
Unless I am quite mistaken, the E34 M5 was not offered in an automatic.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:33 |
|
It is kind of cool, even with the AT
If it had an MT you'd need to buy it right away!
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:34 |
|
FAKE. 3.0 engine like Ian said, plus I'm almost positive these weren't brought to the states and its not old enough to be registered. Plus "Automatic w/choice to use Manual" and I think the only tranny option was a 5 or 6 spd manual.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:36 |
|
As others have said, not an M5. M5 did not have an automatic transmission or a 3.0
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:36 |
|
There are a number of things wrong with the listing, he does say 150k miles. I'm wary of the 3.0 v8 and the autotragic is a killer for me. However, it is white, which I like on BMWs and it has the two panel panoramic sunroof which I've not seen often. I'm always very suspicious when someone claims a 10/10 and all that. I've almost never seen a 10 but have seen several 9s. Be cautious and be prepared to spend. Never buy a car you aren't willing to put money into, because you almost certainly will have to sooner than you'd wish.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:37 |
|
Excellent on gas was a dead giveaway to me. Must be full of shit.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:41 |
|
Hahaha. Eexcellent on gas is pretty relative. I once got 29mpg out of my 325i on a tank. Several times I pushed it to the teens because hoon. I thought teens were bad. A friend of mine who had the same year 325i and was a bigger hoon than me thought it got excellent gas mileage because he'd come from a 400ish hp carburated Camaro. It is reason to be suspicious of what 10/10 means to this guy though.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:41 |
|
But to be fair, he did know it was a 3.0. I'm still calling bs on the 10 until I contact him or see it.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:43 |
|
Pretty much this. That M5 badge would come off the second the title was signed over though. I'd deal with my trepidation about the 3.0V8 for a white, manual, panoramic 5er longroof.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:50 |
|
Now we must find them!
Tiny V8 sounds fun. Maintenance costs be damned!
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:54 |
|
I looked and looked, only found basket cases or things that were too far away to take the chance as a college student. Maybe someday I'll revisit this idea.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:56 |
|
Clean E34 tourings with MTs are few and far between!
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:58 |
|
Ye gads are they ever. I think I've had more luck locating clownshoes.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 02:59 |
|
Lol that's crazy
![]() 12/31/2013 at 03:03 |
|
All M5s before E60 were manual only.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 07:41 |
|
Not an M5 but at $3500, still a sexy deal.
![]() 12/31/2013 at 14:37 |
|
Exactly my thought